On Sat, 20 May 2017 06:16:45 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:52:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > This should be rewritten proper by adding a propagate() callback to those > > slub_attributes which must be propagated and avoid that insane conversion > > to and from ASCII > > Exactly.. > > >, but that's too large for a hot fix. > > What made this such a hot fix? Looks like this crap has been in > for quite a while. It can cause a deadlock with get_online_cpus() that has been uncovered by recent cpu hotplug and lockdep changes that Thomas and Peter have been doing. [ 102.567308] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 102.567308] [ 102.574846] CPU0 CPU1 [ 102.580148] ---- ---- [ 102.585421] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock); [ 102.589808] lock(slab_mutex); [ 102.596166] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock); [ 102.603028] lock(slab_mutex); [ 102.606846] [ 102.606846] *** DEADLOCK *** -- Steve -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
