On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 16:38 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Waiman. > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:34:11AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > The rationale behind the cgroup v2 no internal process constraint is > > to avoid resouorce competition between internal processes and child > > cgroups. However, not all controllers have problem with internal > > process competiton. Enforcing this rule may lead to unnatural process > > hierarchy and unneeded levels for those controllers. > > This isn't necessarily something we can determine by looking at the > current state of controllers. It's true that some controllers - pid > and perf - inherently only care about membership of each task but at > the same time neither really suffers from the constraint either. CPU > which is the problematic one here... (+ cpuacct + cpuset) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
