Both Tejun's and my patches are under review process, the hotplug emulator patchset is much earlier than Tejun's patch. Currently, I did not know how to handle this situation. It seems that I have 3 options: 1) continue to send this patchset based on current upstream kernel 2) continue to send this patchset based on upstream kernel + Tejun's patch 3) Postpone the patchset until Tejun's patches are accepted. Can someone provide some suggestions? Thanks so much. Thanks & Regards, Shaohui -----Original Message----- From: David Rientjes [mailto:rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 5:37 AM To: Zheng, Shaohui; Tejun Heo Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Andi Kleen; dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Ingo Molnar; Brown, Len; Yinghai Lu; Li, Haicheng Subject: Re: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> > This patch is undoubtedly going to conflict with Tejun's unification of the 32 and 64 bit NUMA boot paths, specifically the patch at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087151912379. Tejun, what's the status of that patchset posted on November 27? Any comments about this change? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href