On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 08:03:03AM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:25:22PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> > >> It sounds like memcg accumlates both global and memcg reclaim driver > >> counts -- is this what we want? > > > > Yes. > > > > Consider a fully containerized system that is using only memory.low > > and thus exclusively global reclaim to enforce the partitioning, NOT > > artificial limits and limit reclaim. In this case, we still want to > > know how much reclaim activity each group is experiencing. > > But its also confusing to see memcg.stat's value being greater > than the global value? At-least for me. For example PGSTEAL_DIRECT > inside a memcg > global value of PGSTEAL_DIRECT. Do we make > memcg.stat values sum of all impact on memcg or local to memcg? Yes, I think that global counters should include both results of global and per-cgroup reclaim. I will prepare a separate patch for this. Thank you! Roman -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
