Re: [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We should either keep memset() only for deferred struct pages as what I have in my patches.

Another option is to add a new function struct_page_clear() which would default to memset() and to something else on platforms that decide to optimize it.

On SPARC it would call STBIs, and we would do one membar call after all "struct pages" are initialized.

I think what I sent out already is cleaner and better solution, because I am not sure what kind of performance we would see on other chips.

On 05/11/2017 04:47 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

Have you measured that? I do not think it would be super hard to
measure. I would be quite surprised if this added much if anything at
all as the whole struct page should be in the cache line already. We do
set reference count and other struct members. Almost nobody should be
looking at our page at this time and stealing the cache line. On the
other hand a large memcpy will basically wipe everything away from the
cpu cache. Or am I missing something?


Here is data for single thread (deferred struct page init is disabled):

Intel CPU E7-8895 v3 @ 2.60GHz  1T memory
-----------------------------------------
time to memset "struct pages in memblock: 11.28s
time to init "struct pag"es:               4.90s

Moving memset into __init_single_page()
time to init and memset "struct page"es:   8.39s

SPARC M6 @ 3600 MHz  1T memory
-----------------------------------------
time to memset "struct pages in memblock:  1.60s
time to init "struct pag"es:               3.37s

Moving memset into __init_single_page()
time to init and memset "struct page"es:  12.99s


So, moving memset() into __init_single_page() benefits Intel. I am actually surprised why memset() is so slow on intel when it is called from memblock. But, hurts SPARC, I guess these membars at the end of memset() kills the performance.

Also, when looking at these values, remeber that Intel has twice as many "struct page" for the same amount of memory.

Pasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux