On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:34:26AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 15:40 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Following the reasoning on the last patch in the series, > > this patch allows configuration of the per-CPU vmstat worker: > > it allows the user to disable the per-CPU vmstat worker. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Is there ever a case where you would want to configure > this separately from the vmstat_threshold parameter? > > What use cases are you trying to address? If you have a case where the performance decrease due to lack of vmstat collection aggretation (vmstat_threshold=1) is significant, so you increase vmstat_threshold on these CPUs to, say, 10 (and is willing to accept the cost of outdated vmstatistics by 10). This is the case that i imagined when separating the options in two (with the idea to have policy in userspace, not in the kernel). Do you think such case is not realistic? (Or that there are other problems by having vmstat_threshold > 1 and vmstat_worker=0). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
