Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>  /* context.lock is held for us, so we don't need any locking. */
>>  static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
>>  {
>> +     struct mm_struct *mm = current_mm;
>>       mm_context_t *pc;
>>
>> -     if (current->active_mm != current_mm)
>> +     if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) != current_mm)
>
> While functional correct, this really should compare against 'mm'.
>

Fixed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux