Hi Dave,
Thank you for the review. I will address your comment and update patchset..
Pasha
On 05/03/2017 10:34 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:19:50 -0400
Allow clients to request non-zeroed memory from vmemmap allocator.
The following two public function have a new boolean argument called zero:
__vmemmap_alloc_block_buf()
vmemmap_alloc_block()
When zero is true, memory that is allocated by memblock allocator is zeroed
(the current behavior), when argument is false, the memory is not zeroed.
This change allows for optimizations where client knows when it is better
to zero memory: may be later when other CPUs are started, or may be client
is going to set every byte in the allocated memory, so no need to zero
memory beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@xxxxxxxxxx>
I think when you add a new argument that can adjust behavior, you
should add the new argument but retain exactly the current behavior in
the existing calls.
Then later you can piece by piece change behavior, and document properly
in the commit message what is happening and why the transformation is
legal.
Here, you are adding the new boolean to __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc() and
then making sparse_mem_maps_populate_node() pass false, which changes
behavior such that it doesn't get zero'd memory any more.
Please make one change at a time. Otherwise review and bisection is
going to be difficult.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
