On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 08:27 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/cifs/file.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > index 21d404535739..4b696a23b0b1 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > @@ -2234,14 +2234,16 @@ cifs_writepage_locked(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> > set_page_writeback(page);
> > retry_write:
> > rc = cifs_partialpagewrite(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + if (rc == -EAGAIN && wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) {
> > goto retry_write;
> > + } else if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
> > redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
> > + } else if (rc != 0) {
> > SetPageError(page);
> > + mapping_set_error(page->mapping, rc);
> > + } else {
> > SetPageUptodate(page);
> > + }
>
> Hmmm. I might be a little too nitpicky, but I hate having the same
> partial condition duplicated if possible. Why not:
>
> if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
> if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> goto retry_write;
> redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
> } else if (rc) {
> SetPageError(page);
> mapping_set_error(page->mapping, rc);
> } else {
> SetPageUptodate(page);
> }
>
> Otherwise this looks fine to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
No, you're absolutely right. I merged that change into the patch.
Thanks for the review so far!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
