On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:18:52PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Only access local task's data, so irq disable is only required.
> > + */
> > +static int same_context_xhlock(struct hist_lock *xhlock)
> > +{
> > + struct task_struct *curr = current;
> > +
> > + /* In the case of hardirq context */
> > + if (curr->hardirq_context) {
> > + if (xhlock->hlock.irq_context & 2) /* 2: bitmask for hardirq */
> > + return 1;
> > + /* In the case of softriq context */
> > + } else if (curr->softirq_context) {
> > + if (xhlock->hlock.irq_context & 1) /* 1: bitmask for softirq */
> > + return 1;
> > + /* In the case of process context */
> > + } else {
> > + if (xhlock->work_id == curr->work_id)
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> static bool same_context_xhlock(struct hist_lock *xhlock)
> {
> return xhlock->hlock.irq_context == task_irq_context(current) &&
> xhlock->work_id == current->work_id;
> }
D'oh, thank you.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
