On Thu 20-04-17 10:25:27, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 06:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Let's simulate memory hot online manually
> > Normal Movable
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/valid_zones:Movable Normal
>
> Commands seem to be missing above?
Yes. git commit just dropped everything starting with # which happened
to be the bash prompt for my commands. I have changed that to $ and it
looks as follows
$ echo 0x100000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
$ grep . /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones
Normal Movable
$ echo $((0x100000000+(128<<20))) > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
$ grep . /sys/devices/system/memory/memory3?/valid_zones
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
$ echo $((0x100000000+2*(128<<20))) > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
$ grep . /sys/devices/system/memory/memory3?/valid_zones
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/valid_zones:Normal Movable
$ echo online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/state
$ grep . /sys/devices/system/memory/memory3?/valid_zones
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
/sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/valid_zones:Movable Normal
[...]
> > This means that the same physical online steps as above will lead to the
> > following state:
> > Normal Movable
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> >
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory32/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory33/valid_zones:Normal Movable
> > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory34/valid_zones:Movable
>
> Ditto.
This just copies the above so I didn't add those commands. I can if that
is preferable.
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -533,6 +533,20 @@ static inline bool zone_is_empty(struct zone *zone)
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * Return true if [start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages) range has a non-mpty
>
>
> non-empty
fixed
> > + * intersection with the given zone
> > + */
> > +static inline bool zone_intersects(struct zone *zone,
> > + unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> > +{
>
> I'm looking at your current mmotm tree branch, which looks like this:
>
> + * Return true if [start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages) range has a non-mpty
> + * intersection with the given zone
> + */
> +static inline bool zone_intersects(struct zone *zone,
> + unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + if (zone_is_empty(zone))
> + return false;
> + if (zone->zone_start_pfn <= start_pfn && start_pfn < zone_end_pfn(zone))
> + return true;
> + if (start_pfn + nr_pages > zone->zone_start_pfn)
> + return true;
>
> A false positive is possible here, when start_pfn >= zone_end_pfn(zone)?
Ohh, right. Looks better?
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index eae6da28646e..611ff869fa4d 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -541,10 +541,14 @@ static inline bool zone_intersects(struct zone *zone,
{
if (zone_is_empty(zone))
return false;
- if (zone->zone_start_pfn <= start_pfn && start_pfn < zone_end_pfn(zone))
+ if (start_pfn >= zone_end_pfn(zone))
+ return false;
+
+ if (zone->zone_start_pfn <= start_pfn)
return true;
if (start_pfn + nr_pages > zone->zone_start_pfn)
return true;
+
return false;
}
> > @@ -1029,39 +1018,114 @@ static void node_states_set_node(int node, struct memory_notify *arg)
> > node_set_state(node, N_MEMORY);
> > }
> >
> > -bool zone_can_shift(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> > - enum zone_type target, int *zone_shift)
> > +bool allow_online_pfn_range(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int online_type)
> > {
> > - struct zone *zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> > - enum zone_type idx = zone_idx(zone);
> > - int i;
> > + struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> > + struct zone *movable_zone = &pgdat->node_zones[ZONE_MOVABLE];
> > + struct zone *normal_zone = &pgdat->node_zones[ZONE_NORMAL];
> >
> > - *zone_shift = 0;
> > + /*
> > + * TODO there shouldn't be any inherent reason to have ZONE_NORMAL
> > + * physically before ZONE_MOVABLE. All we need is they do not
> > + * overlap. Historically we didn't allow ZONE_NORMAL after ZONE_MOVABLE
> > + * though so let's stick with it for simplicity for now.
> > + * TODO make sure we do not overlap with ZONE_DEVICE
>
> Is this last TODO a blocker, unlike the others?
I think it is not but my knowledge of the zone device is very limited. I
was hoping for Dan's feedback here. From what I understand Zone device
occupies the high end of the address space so we shouldn't overlap here.
Is this correct Dan?
[...]
> > + if (online_type == MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE && !can_online_high_movable(nid))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - zone = move_pfn_range(zone_shift, pfn, pfn + nr_pages);
> > + /* associate pfn range with the zone */
> > + zone = move_pfn_range(online_type, nid, pfn, nr_pages);
> > if (!zone)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Nit: This !zone currently cannot happen.
fixed
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
