Re: [PATCH] mm: Make truncate_inode_pages_range() killable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 17:40 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Changing a fundamental function, silently not to do its essential job,
> when something in the kernel has forgotten (or is slow to) unlock_page():
> that seems very wrong to me in many ways.  But linux-fsdevel, Cc'ed, will
> be a better forum to advise on how to solve the problem you're seeing.

Hello Hugh,

It seems like you have misunderstood the purpose of the patch I posted. It's
neither a missing unlock_page() nor slow I/O that I want to address but a
genuine deadlock. In case you would not be familiar with the queue_if_no_path
multipath configuration option, the multipath.conf man page is available at
e.g. https://linux.die.net/man/5/multipath.conf.

Bart.
��.n������g����a����&ޖ)���)��h���&������梷�����Ǟ�m������)������^�����������v���O��zf������




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux