Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: fix potential deadlock in zswap_frontswap_store()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/03/2017 03:37 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/03/2017 11:47 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 31-03-17 10:00:30, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Andrey Ryabinin
>>> <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> zswap_frontswap_store() is called during memory reclaim from
>>>> __frontswap_store() from swap_writepage() from shrink_page_list().
>>>> This may happen in NOFS context, thus zswap shouldn't use __GFP_FS,
>>>> otherwise we may renter into fs code and deadlock.
>>>> zswap_frontswap_store() also shouldn't use __GFP_IO to avoid recursion
>>>> into itself.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to enter fs code (or IO) from zswap_frontswap_store()
>>> other than recursive memory reclaim? However recursive memory reclaim
>>> is protected through PF_MEMALLOC task flag. The change seems fine but
>>> IMHO reasoning needs an update. Adding Michal for expert opinion.
>>
>> Yes this is true. 
> 
> Actually, no. I think we have a bug in allocator which may lead to recursive direct reclaim.
> 
> E.g. for costly order allocations (or order > 0 && ac->migratetype != MIGRATE_MOVABLE)
> with __GFP_NOMEMALLOC (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed() returns false)
> __alloc_pages_slowpath() may call __alloc_pages_direct_compact() and unconditionally clear PF_MEMALLOC:
> 
> __alloc_pages_direct_compact():
> ...
> 	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> 	*compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> 									prio);
> 	current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
> 
> 
> 
> And later in __alloc_pages_slowpath():
> 
> 	/* Avoid recursion of direct reclaim */
> 	if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)        <=== false
> 		goto nopage;
> 
> 	/* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
> 	page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> 							&did_some_progress);
> 


Seems it was broken by

a8161d1ed6098506303c65b3701dedba876df42a
Author: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Jul 28 15:49:19 2016 -0700

    mm, page_alloc: restructure direct compaction handling in slowpath

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux