On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:55:05PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 31-03-17 18:49:05, Joey Lee wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > @@ -241,11 +232,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> > > NULL, acpi_bus_offline, (void *)true,
> > > (void **)&errdev);
> > > - if (!errdev || acpi_force_hot_remove)
> > > + if (!errdev)
> > > acpi_bus_offline(handle, 0, (void *)true,
> > > (void **)&errdev);
> > > -
> > > - if (errdev && !acpi_force_hot_remove) {
> > > + else {
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Here should still checks the parent's errdev state then rollback
> > parent/children to online state:
> >
> > - if (errdev && !acpi_force_hot_remove) {
> > + if (errdev) {
>
> You are right, I have missed that acpi_bus_offline modifies errdev.
> Thanks for spotting that! Updated patch is below.
> ---
> >From 8df0abd29988ffb52b6df52407b96d6015861bb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:08:41 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] acpi: drop support for force_remove
>
> /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove was presumably added to support
> auto offlining in the past. This is, however, inherently dangerous for
> some hotplugable resources like memory. The memory offlining fails when
> the memory is still in use and cannot be dropped or migrated. If we
> ignore the failure we are basically allowing for subtle memory
> corruption or a crash.
>
> We have actually noticed the later while hitting BUG() during the memory
> hotremove (remove_memory):
> ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size - 1), NULL,
> check_memblock_offlined_cb);
> if (ret)
> BUG();
>
> it took us quite non-trivial time realize that the customer had
> force_remove enabled. Even if the BUG was removed here and we could
> propagate the error up the call chain it wouldn't help at all because
> then we would hit a crash or a memory corruption later and harder to
> debug. So force_remove is unfixable for the memory hotremove. We haven't
> checked other hotplugable resources to be prone to a similar problems.
>
> Remove the force_remove functionality because it is not fixable currently.
> Keep the sysfs file and report an error if somebody tries to enable it.
> Encourage users to report about the missing functionality and work with
> them with an alternative solution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
This patch is good to me. Please feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@xxxxxxxx>
Regards
Joey Lee
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
