On March 31, 2017 2:49 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 31-03-17 11:49:49, Hillf Danton wrote:
> [...]
> > > -/* Can fail with -ENOMEM from allocating a wait table with vmalloc() or
> > > - * alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic()/memblock_virt_alloc_node_nopanic() */
> > > -static int __ref ensure_zone_is_initialized(struct zone *zone,
> > > +static void __ref ensure_zone_is_initialized(struct zone *zone,
> > > unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long num_pages)
> > > {
> > > - if (zone_is_empty(zone))
> > > - return init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, num_pages);
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > + if (!zone_is_empty(zone))
> > > + init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, num_pages);
> > > }
> > Semantic change added?
>
> could you be more specific?
Well, I'm wondering why you are trying to initiate a nonempty zone.
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
