Re: in_irq_or_nmi() and RFC patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:44:41PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> @@ -2481,7 +2481,11 @@ void free_hot_cold_page(struct page *page, bool cold)
>  	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>  	int migratetype;
>  
> -	if (in_interrupt()) {
> +	/*
> +	 * Exclude (hard) IRQ and NMI context from using the pcplists.
> +	 * But allow softirq context, via disabling BH.
> +	 */
> +	if (in_irq() || irqs_disabled()) {

Why do you need irqs_disabled() ? Also, your comment is stale, it still
refers to NMI context.

>  		__free_pages_ok(page, 0);
>  		return;
>  	}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux