On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:32:00 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, Andrew, could you help me to check whether the overall design is > reasonable? > > Hi, Hugh, Shaohua, Minchan and Rik, could you help me to review the > swap part of the patchset? Especially [1/9], [3/9], [4/9], [5/9], > [6/9], [9/9]. > > Hi, Andrea could you help me to review the THP part of the patchset? > Especially [2/9], [7/9] and [8/9]. > > Hi, Johannes, Michal and Vladimir, I am not very confident about the > memory cgroup part, especially [2/9]. Could you help me to review it? > > And for all, Any comment is welcome! > > > Recently, the performance of the storage devices improved so fast that > we cannot saturate the disk bandwidth with single logical CPU when do > page swap out even on a high-end server machine. Because the > performance of the storage device improved faster than that of single > logical CPU. And it seems that the trend will not change in the near > future. On the other hand, the THP becomes more and more popular > because of increased memory size. So it becomes necessary to optimize > THP swap performance. I'll merge this patchset for testing purposes, but I don't believe that it has yet had sufficient review. And thanks for drawing our attention to those parts where you believe close review is needed - that helps. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
