Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2017-03-21 18:18 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> in_interrupt() also returns true when bh is disabled in task context.
>> That's not what fail_task() wants to check.
>> Use the new in_task() predicate that does the right thing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
>
> This change looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>


Andrew, will you take this to mm please?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux