On 03/22/2017 01:41 AM, Aaron Lu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:33:35PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:00:02PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: >>> Introduce a workqueue for all the free workers so that user can fine >>> tune how many workers can be active through sysfs interface: max_active. >>> More workers will normally lead to better performance, but too many can >>> cause severe lock contention. >> >> Let me ask a question. >> >> How well can workqueue distribute the jobs in multiple CPU? > > I would say it's good enough for my needs. > After all, it doesn't need many kworkers to achieve the 50% time > decrease: 2-4 kworkers for EP and 4-8 kworkers for EX are enough from > previous attched data. It's also worth noting that we'd like to *also* like to look into increasing how scalable freeing pages to a given zone is. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>