On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, hpa@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On March 21, 2017 3:21:13 PM PDT, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > >> v3: > >> - clear x32 syscall flag during x32 -> x86-64 exec() (thanks, HPA). > > > >For correctness sake, this wants to be cleared in the IA32 path as > >well. It's not causing any harm, but .... > > > >I'll amend the patch. > > > >Thanks, > > > > tglx > > Since the i386 syscall namespace is totally separate (and different), > should we simply change the system call number to the appropriate > sys_execve number? That should work as well and would be more intuitive. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
