On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:08:41AM -0700, hpa@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On March 19, 2017 1:26:58 AM PDT, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Mar 19, 2017 09:25, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What is the epectation when the hint addr is below 128TB but addr + len > > > 128TB ? Should such mmap request fail ? > > > >Yes, I believe so. > > This *better* be conditional on some kind of settable limit. Having a > barrier in the middle of the address space for no apparent reason to > "clean" software is insane. I disagree with Kirill here. If addr+len > 128TB, I think we should assume the application is 57-bit aware. Specifying hint addresses is such a rare thing to do anyway. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
