On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:37:56 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > this can make it harder to read, in _the worst case_. one printk()
> > guaranteed that we would see a single line in the serial log/etc.
> > the sort of a problem with multiple printks is that printks coming
> > from other CPUs will split that "previously single" line.
>
> Not true. Note the multiple \n uses in the original code.
hm? Won't printk("a\na") atomically emit all three chars into the log
buffer?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
