On 3/16/2017 5:16 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:35:30AM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
We could update this patch to use the below logic:
* CPUID(0) - Check for AuthenticAMD
* CPID(1) - Check if under hypervisor
* CPUID(0x80000000) - Check for highest supported leaf
* CPUID(0x8000001F).EAX - Check for SME and SEV support
* rdmsr (MSR_K8_SYSCFG)[MemEncryptionModeEnc] - Check if SMEE is set
Actually, it is still not clear to me *why* we need to do anything
special wrt SEV in the guest.
Lemme clarify: why can't the guest boot just like a normal Linux on
baremetal and use the SME(!) detection code to set sme_enable and so
on? IOW, I'd like to avoid all those checks whether we're running under
hypervisor and handle all that like we're running on baremetal.
Because there are differences between how SME and SEV behave
(instruction fetches are always decrypted under SEV, DMA to an
encrypted location is not supported under SEV, etc.) we need to
determine which mode we are in so that things can be setup properly
during boot. For example, if SEV is active the kernel will already
be encrypted and so we don't perform that step or the trampoline area
for bringing up an AP must be decrypted for SME but encrypted for SEV.
The hypervisor check will provide that ability to determine how we
handle things.
Thanks,
Tom
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
