Re: [RFC 0/6] Slab Fragmentation Reduction V16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 08-03-17 09:58:58, Cristopher Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > JFTR the previous version was posted here: https://lwn.net/Articles/371892/
> > and Dave had some concerns https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/8/329 which led
> > to a different approach and design of the slab shrinking
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/8/329.
> >
> > I haven't looked at this series yet but has those concerns been
> > addressed/considered?
> 
> Well yes this has been discussed for a couple of years. The basic approach
> is not only needed for the file systems (like what Chinner was focusing
> on) but in general for slab caches. The objection was regarding the
> integration into the slab reclaim logic in vmscan.c and the filesystem
> reclaim in general.
> 
> Dave and Matthew were at linux.conf.au and we agreed to first try it with
> the radix tree and then generalize from there.  The reclaim logic
> was a bit hacky and we will have to find some better way to
> integrate this.
> 
> There is a video on youtube capturing the discussion (My talk on movable
> kernel objects).

Hmm, OK. There seems to be a slot to discuss this at LSFMM this year so
I hope we can discuss your proposal there.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux