Re: [PATCH 2/3] Refactor zone_reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 10:16:34]:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 10:23:29]:
> 
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:45:55 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Refactor zone_reclaim, move reusable functionality outside
> > > of zone_reclaim. Make zone_reclaim_unmapped_pages modular
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Why is this min_mapped_pages based on zone (IOW, per-zone) ?
> >
> 
> Kamezawa-San, this has been the design before the refactoring (it is
> based on zone_reclaim_mode and reclaim based on top of that).  I am
> reusing bits of existing technology. The advantage of it being
> per-zone is that it integrates well with kswapd. 
>

My local MTA failed to deliver the message, trying again. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]