From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
page_table_alloc then uses the flag for a single page allocation. This
means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it has
always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.
An earlier attempt to remove the flag 10d58bf297e2 ("s390: get rid of
superfluous __GFP_REPEAT") has missed this one but the situation is very
same here.
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
index 995f78532cc2..2776bad61094 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct page *page_table_alloc_pgste(struct mm_struct *mm)
struct page *page;
unsigned long *table;
- page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT);
+ page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (page) {
table = (unsigned long *) page_to_phys(page);
clear_table(table, _PAGE_INVALID, PAGE_SIZE/2);
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
