On 03/03/2017 04:52 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/02/2017 04:48 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> Changes slab object description from: >>> >>> Object at ffff880068388540, in cache kmalloc-128 size: 128 >>> >>> to: >>> >>> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff880068388540 >>> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128 >>> The buggy address is located 123 bytes inside of >>> 128-byte region [ffff880068388540, ffff8800683885c0) >>> >>> Makes it more explanatory and adds information about relative offset >>> of the accessed address to the start of the object. >>> >> >> I don't think that this is an improvement. You replaced one simple line with a huge >> and hard to parse text without giving any new/useful information. >> Except maybe offset, it useful sometimes, so wouldn't mind adding it to description. > Agreed. > How about: > =========== > Access 123 bytes inside of 128-byte region [ffff880068388540, ffff8800683885c0) > Object at ffff880068388540 belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 > =========== > ? > I would just add the offset in the end: Object at ffff880068388540, in cache kmalloc-128 size: 128 accessed at offset y -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>