On March 01, 2017 5:40 AM Johannes Weiner wrote: > > The backoff mechanism is not needed. If we have MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES > loops without progress, we'll OOM anyway; backing off might cut one or > two iterations off that in the rare OOM case. If we have intermittent > success reclaiming a few pages, the backoff function gets reset also, > and so is of little help in these scenarios. > > We might want a backoff function for when there IS progress, but not > enough to be satisfactory. But this isn't that. Remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
