Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:17:07PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > +void lock_commit_crosslock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct cross_lock *xlock;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!current->xhlocks)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > > +	check_flags(flags);
> > > +	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!graph_lock())
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	xlock = &((struct lockdep_map_cross *)lock)->xlock;
> > > +	if (atomic_read(&xlock->ref) > 0 && !commit_xhlocks(xlock))
> > 
> > You terminate with graph_lock() held.
> 
> Oops. What did I do? I'll fix it.

I remembered it. It's no problem because it would terminate there, only
if _both_ 'xlock->ref > 0' and 'commit_xhlocks returns 0' are true.
Otherwise, it will unlock the lock safely.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux