> - Even if the default maximum size is reduced the size of these > tables should still be tunable, as it really depends on the way > machine is used, and in it is possible that for some use patterns > large hash tables are necessary. I consider it very unlikely that a 8G dentry hash table ever makes sense. I cannot even imagine a workload where you would have that many active files. It's just a bad configuration that should be avoided. And when the tables are small enough you don't need these hacks. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
