On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:35:34PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 24-02-17 13:31:45, Shaohua Li wrote: > > There are a few places the code assumes anonymous pages should have > > SwapBacked flag set. MADV_FREE pages are anonymous pages but we are > > going to add them to LRU_INACTIVE_FILE list and clear SwapBacked flag > > for them. The assumption doesn't hold any more, so fix them. > > > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx> > > Looks good to me. > [...] > > index 96eb85c..c621088 100644 > > --- a/mm/rmap.c > > +++ b/mm/rmap.c > > @@ -1416,7 +1416,8 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > * Store the swap location in the pte. > > * See handle_pte_fault() ... > > */ > > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapCache(page), page); > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapCache(page) && PageSwapBacked(page), > > + page); > > just this part makes me scratch my head. I really do not understand what > kind of problem it tries to prevent from, maybe I am missing something > obvoious... Just check a page which isn't lazyfree but wrongly enters here without swap entry. Or maybe you suggest we delete this statement? Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
