Hi Shaohua, On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:50:41AM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > @@ -268,6 +268,12 @@ static void __activate_page(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec, > int lru = page_lru_base_type(page); > > del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); > + if (PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapBacked(page)) { > + SetPageSwapBacked(page); > + /* charge to anon scanned/rotated reclaim_stat */ > + file = 0; > + lru = LRU_INACTIVE_ANON; > + } As per my previous feedback, please remove this. Write-after-free will be caught and handled in the reclaimer, read-after-free is a bug that really doesn't require optimizing page aging for. And we definitely shouldn't declare invalid data suddenly valid because it's being read. > @@ -561,20 +567,26 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec, > } > > > -static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec, > +static void lru_lazyfree_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec, > void *arg) > { > - if (PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) { > - int file = page_is_file_cache(page); > - int lru = page_lru_base_type(page); > + if (PageLRU(page) && PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page) && > + !PageUnevictable(page)) { > + bool active = PageActive(page); > > - del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE); > + del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON + active); > ClearPageActive(page); > ClearPageReferenced(page); > - add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); > + /* > + * lazyfree pages are clean anonymous pages. They have > + * SwapBacked flag cleared to destinguish normal anonymous > + * pages distinguish Otherwise, looks great to me. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>