On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:41:00PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Kirill what's your take on making the registration checks stricter? > If we would add a vma_is_anonymous_not_in_fault implemented like above > vma_can_userfault would just need a > s/vma_is_anonymous/vma_is_anonymous_not_in_fault/ and it would be more > strict. khugepaged could be then converted to use it too instead of > hardcoding this vm_flags check. Unless I'm mistaken I would consider > such a change to the registration code, purely a cleanup to add a more > strict check. [sorry for later response] I think more strict vma_is_anonymous() is a good thing. But I don't see a point introducing one more helper. Let's just make the existing helper work better. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
