On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:49:41 -0800 Ying Han <yinghan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The current implementation of memcg only supports direct reclaim and this > patchset adds the support for background reclaim. Per cgroup background > reclaim is needed which spreads out the memory pressure over longer period > of time and smoothes out the system performance. > > The current implementation is not a stable version, and it crashes sometimes > on my NUMA machine. Before going further for debugging, I would like to start > the discussion and hear the feedbacks of the initial design. > It's welcome but please wait until merge of dirty-ratio. And please post after you don't see crash .... Description of design is appreciated. Where the cost for "kswapd" is charged agaist if cpu cgroup is used at the same time ? > Current status: > I run through some simple tests which reads/writes a large file and makes sure > it triggers per cgroup kswapd on the low_wmark. Also, I compared at > pg_steal/pg_scan ratio w/o background reclaim. > > Step1: Create a cgroup with 500M memory_limit and set the min_free_kbytes to 1024. > $ mount -t cgroup -o cpuset,memory cpuset /dev/cgroup > $ mkdir /dev/cgroup/A > $ echo 0 >/dev/cgroup/A/cpuset.cpus > $ echo 0 >/dev/cgroup/A/cpuset.mems > $ echo 500m >/dev/cgroup/A/memory.limit_in_bytes > $ echo 1024 >/dev/cgroup/A/memory.min_free_kbytes > $ echo $$ >/dev/cgroup/A/tasks > > Step2: Check the wmarks. > $ cat /dev/cgroup/A/memory.reclaim_wmarks > memcg_low_wmark 98304000 > memcg_high_wmark 81920000 > > Step3: Dirty the pages by creating a 20g file on hard drive. > $ ddtest -D /export/hdc3/dd -b 1024 -n 20971520 -t 1 > > Checked the memory.stat w/o background reclaim. It used to be all the pages are > reclaimed from direct reclaim, and now about half of them are reclaimed at > background. (note: writing '0' to min_free_kbytes disables per cgroup kswapd) > > Only direct reclaim With background reclaim: > kswapd_steal 0 kswapd_steal 2751822 > pg_pgsteal 5100401 pg_pgsteal 2476676 > kswapd_pgscan 0 kswapd_pgscan 6019373 > pg_scan 5542464 pg_scan 3851281 > pgrefill 304505 pgrefill 348077 > pgoutrun 0 pgoutrun 44568 > allocstall 159278 allocstall 75669 > > Step4: Cleanup > $ echo $$ >/dev/cgroup/tasks > $ echo 0 > /dev/cgroup/A/memory.force_empty > > Step5: Read the 20g file into the pagecache. > $ cat /export/hdc3/dd/tf0 > /dev/zero; > > Checked the memory.stat w/o background reclaim. All the clean pages are reclaimed at > background instead of direct reclaim. > > Only direct reclaim With background reclaim > kswapd_steal 0 kswapd_steal 3512424 > pg_pgsteal 3461280 pg_pgsteal 0 > kswapd_pgscan 0 kswapd_pgscan 3512440 > pg_scan 3461280 pg_scan 0 > pgrefill 0 pgrefill 0 > pgoutrun 0 pgoutrun 74973 > allocstall 108165 allocstall 0 > What is the trigger for starting background reclaim ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>