On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > On 02/11/2017 11:23 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > > > > > 2017-02-10 23:10 GMT+03:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > I can't say that I'm thrilled about the ifdeffery this is adding. > > > > > > > > > > But I can't think of a cleaner approach at a quick glance, though - > > > > > that's generic and arch-specific code intertwined muck. Sad face. > > > > > > > > It's trivial enough to do .... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > tglx > > > > > > > > --- > > > > arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ > > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c > > > > @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ static unsigned long stack_maxrandom_siz > > > > #define MIN_GAP (128*1024*1024UL + stack_maxrandom_size()) > > > > #define MAX_GAP (TASK_SIZE/6*5) > > > > > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > +# define mmap_rnd_compat_bits mmap_rnd_bits > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > > > >From my POV, I can't say that it's clearer to shadow mmap_compat_bits > > > like that then to have two functions with native/compat names. > > > But if you insist, I'll resend patches set with your version. > > > > You can make that > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > # define mmap32_rnd_bits mmap_compat_rnd_bits > > # define mmap64_rnd_bits mmap_rnd_bits > > #else > > # define mmap32_rnd_bits mmap_rnd_bits > > # define mmap64_rnd_bits mmap_rnd_bits > > #endif > > > > and use that. That's still way more readable than the unholy ifdef mess. > > Ok, will send this version in v5. > Ping me if you mind me using your SOB for this patch. Suggested-by is enough -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
