On 02/08/2017 07:31 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> There are certain devices like specialized accelerator, GPU cards, network
> cards, FPGA cards etc which might contain onboard memory which is coherent
> along with the existing system RAM while being accessed either from the CPU
> or from the device. They share some similar properties with that of normal
> system RAM but at the same time can also be different with respect to
> system RAM.
>
> User applications might be interested in using this kind of coherent device
> memory explicitly or implicitly along side the system RAM utilizing all
> possible core memory functions like anon mapping (LRU), file mapping (LRU),
> page cache (LRU), driver managed (non LRU), HW poisoning, NUMA migrations
> etc. To achieve this kind of tight integration with core memory subsystem,
> the device onboard coherent memory must be represented as a memory only
> NUMA node. At the same time arch must export some kind of a function to
> identify of this node as a coherent device memory not any other regular
> cpu less memory only NUMA node.
>
> After achieving the integration with core memory subsystem coherent device
> memory might still need some special consideration inside the kernel. There
> can be a variety of coherent memory nodes with different expectations from
> the core kernel memory. But right now only one kind of special treatment is
> considered which requires certain isolation.
>
> Now consider the case of a coherent device memory node type which requires
> isolation. This kind of coherent memory is onboard an external device
> attached to the system through a link where there is always a chance of a
> link failure taking down the entire memory node with it. More over the
> memory might also have higher chance of ECC failure as compared to the
> system RAM. Hence allocation into this kind of coherent memory node should
> be regulated. Kernel allocations must not come here. Normal user space
> allocations too should not come here implicitly (without user application
> knowing about it). This summarizes isolation requirement of certain kind of
> coherent device memory node as an example. There can be different kinds of
> isolation requirement also.
>
> Some coherent memory devices might not require isolation altogether after
> all. Then there might be other coherent memory devices which might require
> some other special treatment after being part of core memory representation
> . For now, will look into isolation seeking coherent device memory node not
> the other ones.
>
> To implement the integration as well as isolation, the coherent memory node
> must be present in N_MEMORY and a new N_COHERENT_DEVICE node mask inside
> the node_states[] array. During memory hotplug operations, the new nodemask
> N_COHERENT_DEVICE is updated along with N_MEMORY for these coherent device
> memory nodes. This also creates the following new sysfs based interface to
> list down all the coherent memory nodes of the system.
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/is_coherent_node
>
> Architectures must export function arch_check_node_cdm() which identifies
> any coherent device memory node in case they enable CONFIG_COHERENT_DEVICE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-node | 7 +++++
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 7 +++++
> drivers/base/node.c | 6 ++++
> include/linux/node.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/nodemask.h | 3 ++
> mm/Kconfig | 4 +++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 10 ++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 14 +++++++--
> 9 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-node b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-node
> index 5b2d0f0..fa2f105 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-node
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-node
> @@ -29,6 +29,13 @@ Description:
> Nodes that have regular or high memory.
> Depends on CONFIG_HIGHMEM.
>
> +What: /sys/devices/system/node/is_coherent_device
> +Date: January 2017
> +Contact: Linux Memory Management list <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> +Description:
> + Lists the nodemask of nodes that have coherent device memory.
> + Depends on CONFIG_COHERENT_DEVICE.
> +
> What: /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX
> Date: October 2002
> Contact: Linux Memory Management list <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 281f4f1..77b97fe 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
> select HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY
> select HAVE_KERNEL_GZIP
> + select COHERENT_DEVICE if PPC_BOOK3S_64
>
The following change here will fix the build problems in both the configs
ps3_defconfig and maple_defconfig. Will include this in next version.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 77b97fe..1cff239 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ config PPC
select ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
select HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY
select HAVE_KERNEL_GZIP
- select COHERENT_DEVICE if PPC_BOOK3S_64
+ select COHERENT_DEVICE if PPC_BOOK3S_64 && NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
