On 02/07/2017 11:37 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 01/30/2017 11:24 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> On 01/29/2017 07:35 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> + if ((new_pol->mode == MPOL_BIND)
>>>> + && nodemask_has_cdm(new_pol->v.nodes))
>>>> + set_vm_cdm(vma);
>>> So, if you did:
>>>
>>> mbind(addr, PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_BIND, all_nodes, ...);
>>> mbind(addr, PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_BIND, one_non_cdm_node, ...);
>>>
>>> You end up with a VMA that can never have KSM done on it, etc... Even
>>> though there's no good reason for it. I guess /proc/$pid/smaps might be
>>> able to help us figure out what was going on here, but that still seems
>>> like an awful lot of damage.
>> Agreed, this VMA should not remain tagged after the second call. It does
>> not make sense. For this kind of scenarios we can re-evaluate the VMA
>> tag every time the nodemask change is attempted. But if we are looking for
>> some runtime re-evaluation then we need to steal some cycles are during
>> general VMA processing opportunity points like merging and split to do
>> the necessary re-evaluation. Should do we do these kind two kinds of
>> re-evaluation to be more optimal ?
> I'm still unconvinced that you *need* detection like this. Scanning big
> VMAs is going to be really painful.
>
> I thought I asked before but I can't find it in this thread. But, we
> have explicit interfaces for disabling KSM and khugepaged. Why do we
> need implicit ones like this in addition to those?
Missed the discussion we had on this last time around I think. My bad, sorry
about that. IIUC we can disable KSM through madvise() call, in fact I guess
its disabled by default and need to be enabled. We can just have a similar
interface to disable auto NUMA for a specific VMA or we can handle it page
by page basis with something like this.
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 1099d35..101dfd9 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3518,6 +3518,9 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
goto out;
}
+ if (is_cdm_node(page_to_nid(page)))
+ goto out;
+
/* Migrate to the requested node */
migrated = migrate_misplaced_page(page, vma, target_nid);
if (migrated) {
I am still looking into these aspects. BTW have posted the minimum set of
CDM patches which defines and isolates CDM node.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
