During global reclaim, the nr_reclaimed passed to vmpressure includes the
pages reclaimed from slab. But the corresponding scanned slab pages is
not passed. This can cause total reclaimed pages to be greater than
scanned, causing an unsigned underflow in vmpressure resulting in a
critical event being sent to root cgroup. It was also noticed that, apart
from the underflow, there is an impact to the vmpressure values because of
this. While moving from kernel version 3.18 to 4.4, a difference is seen
in the vmpressure values for the same workload resulting in a different
behaviour of the vmpressure consumer. One such case is of a vmpressure
based lowmemorykiller. It is observed that the vmpressure events are
received late and less in number resulting in tasks not being killed at
the right time. The following numbers show the impact on reclaim activity
due to the change in behaviour of lowmemorykiller on a 4GB device. The test
launches a number of apps in sequence and repeats it multiple times.
v4.4 v3.18
pgpgin 163016456 145617236
pgpgout 4366220 4188004
workingset_refault 29857868 26781854
workingset_activate 6293946 5634625
pswpin 1327601 1133912
pswpout 3593842 3229602
pgalloc_dma 99520618 94402970
pgalloc_normal 104046854 98124798
pgfree 203772640 192600737
pgmajfault 2126962 1851836
pgsteal_kswapd_dma 19732899 18039462
pgsteal_kswapd_normal 19945336 17977706
pgsteal_direct_dma 206757 131376
pgsteal_direct_normal 236783 138247
pageoutrun 116622 108370
allocstall 7220 4684
compact_stall 931 856
This is a regression introduced by commit 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm: vmscan:
invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()").
So do not consider reclaimed slab pages for vmpressure calculation. The
reclaimed pages from slab can be excluded because the freeing of a page
by slab shrinking depends on each slab's object population, making the
cost model (i.e. scan:free) different from that of LRU. Also, not every
shrinker accounts the pages it reclaims.
Fixes: 6b4f7799c6a5 ("mm: vmscan: invoke slab shrinkers from shrink_zone()")
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shashim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 947ab6f..8969f8e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2594,16 +2594,23 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
node_lru_pages);
+ /*
+ * Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency. The reclaimed
+ * pages from slab is excluded here because the corresponding
+ * scanned pages is not accounted. Moreover, freeing a page
+ * by slab shrinking depends on each slab's object population,
+ * making the cost model (i.e. scan:free) different from that
+ * of LRU.
+ */
+ vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
+ sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
+ sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
+
if (reclaim_state) {
sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
}
- /* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
- vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
- sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
- sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
-
if (sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed)
reclaimable = true;
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
