Re: [PATCH] mm: replace FAULT_FLAG_SIZE with parameter to huge_fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 03:56 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
>> [cannot apply to linus/master linux/master v4.10-rc6 next-20170203]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>
> This one is a bit odd. I just pulled mmotm tree master branch and built
> with the attached .config and it passed for me (and I don't see this
> commit in the master branch). I also built linux-next with this patch on
> top and it also passes with attached .config. Looking at the err log
> below it seems the code has a mix of partial from before and after the
> patch. I'm rather confused about it....

This is a false positive. It tried to build it against latest mainline
instead of linux-next.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux