[RFC][PATCH 6/7] x86, mpx, selftests: Use prctl header instead of magic numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I got away with just hard-coding the prctl() numbers in the MPX
selftests.  Include the kernel header so we can just use the
symbolic names.

---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c~mawa-068-selftests-inc tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c~mawa-068-selftests-inc	2017-02-01 15:12:18.083231385 -0800
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c	2017-02-01 15:12:18.087231565 -0800
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ int zap_all_every_this_many_mallocs = 10
 #include "mpx-debug.h"
 #include "mpx-mm.h"
 
+#include "../../../../include/uapi/linux/prctl.h"
+
 #ifndef __always_inline
 #define __always_inline inline __attribute__((always_inline)
 #endif
@@ -666,7 +668,7 @@ bool process_specific_init(void)
 	check_clear(dir, size);
 	enable_mpx(dir);
 	check_clear(dir, size);
-	if (prctl(43, 0, 0, 0, 0)) {
+	if (prctl(PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT, 0, 0, 0, 0)) {
 		printf("no MPX support\n");
 		abort();
 		return false;
@@ -676,7 +678,7 @@ bool process_specific_init(void)
 
 bool process_specific_finish(void)
 {
-	if (prctl(44)) {
+	if (prctl(PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT)) {
 		printf("no MPX support\n");
 		return false;
 	}
_

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux