Re: [PATCH 01/12] uprobes: split THPs before trying replace them

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:55:22AM -0800, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For THPs page_check_address() always fails. It's better to split them
> > > > first before trying to replace.
> > > 
> > > So what does this mean.  uprobes simply fails to work when trying to
> > > place a probe into a THP memory region?
> > 
> > Looks like we can end up with endless retry loop in uprobe_write_opcode().
> > 
> > > How come nobody noticed (and reported) this when using the feature?
> > 
> > I guess it's not often used for anon memory.
> > 
> 
> The first time the breakpoint is hit on a page, it replaces the text
> page with anon page.  Now lets assume we insert breakpoints in all the
> pages in a range. Here each page is individually replaced by a non THP
> anonpage. (since we dont have bulk breakpoint insertion support,
> breakpoint insertion happens one at a time). Now the only interesting
> case may be when each of these replaced pages happen to be physically
> contiguous so that THP kicks in to replace all of these pages with one
> THP page. Can happen in practice?

The problem is with the page you try to replace, not with page that you
replace it with.

> Are there any other cases that I have missed?

The binary on tmpfs with huge pages. I wrote test-case that triggers the
problem.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux