On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:30:39PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23 2017, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > ... can it even wait for *another* TEMPORARY allocation? I really think > > this discussion needs to take place in a room with more people present > > so we can get misunderstandings hammered out and general acceptance of > > the consensus. > > I suspect you are right, but throwing around some thoughts in advance, > to spark new ideas, can't hurt? I hate going to meetings where the > agenda has a topic, but no background discussion. It means that I have > to do all my thinking on my feet (not that I'll be at this meeting). I have no desire to shut down discussion on the list! I just wished to point out that I don't think we're going to reach consensus on this issue, and so it'll be worth having on the agenda. Also, I am sad that I won't see you in Boston, and that you weren't able to be in Hobart either. Maybe Sydney next year? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
