Re: [patch v2 linux-next] userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: unmap the correct pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:02:37PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > kunmap_atomic() and kunmap() take different pointers.  People often get
> > these mixed up.
> > 
> > Fixes: 16374db2e9a0 ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: fix __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb retry/error processing")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2: I was also unmapping the wrong pointer because I had a typo.
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index 6012a05..aca8ef6 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ long copy_huge_page_from_user(struct page *dst_page,
> >  				(const void __user *)(src + i * PAGE_SIZE),
> >  				PAGE_SIZE);
> >  		if (allow_pagefault)
> > -			kunmap(page_kaddr);
> > +			kunmap(page_kaddr + i);
> >  		else
> >  			kunmap_atomic(page_kaddr);
> 
> I think you need to look at that again.

Oh wow...  What absolute heck!  I can't believe how badly I'm messing
up on this.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]