On 01/13/2017 09:08 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 01/13/2017 07:29 AM, Rob Gardner wrote:
so perhaps ADI should simply be disallowed for memory mapped to
files, and this particular complication can be avoided. Thoughts?
What's a "file" from your perspective?
In Linux, shared memory is a file. hugetlbfs is done with files. Many
databases mmap() their data into their address space.
Of course I meant a traditional file is the DOS sense, ie, data stored
on something magnetic. ;) But it doesn't really matter because I am just
trying to envision a use case for any of the mmap scenarios.
For instance a very persuasive use case for ADI is to 'color' malloc
memory, freed malloc memory, and malloc's metadata with different ADI
version tags so as to catch buffer overflows, underflows, use-after-free
and use-after-realloc type scenarios. What is an equally compelling or
even mildly interesting use case for ADI in shared memory and file mmap
situations? Maybe you could mmap a file and immediately tag the entire
thing with some version, thus disallowing all access to it, and then
hand out access a chunk at a time. And then?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>