On Wed 11-01-17 11:29:28, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > I know there's work on this for xfs, but could this be done in generic mm > code? > > What are the obstacles? page->mapping and page->index are the obvious > ones. Yes, these two are the main that come to my mind. Also you'd need to somehow share the mapping->i_mmap tree so that unmap_mapping_range() works. > If that's too difficult is it maybe enough to share mappings between > files while they are completely identical and clone the mapping when > necessary? Well, but how would the page->mapping->host indirection work? Even if you have identical contents of the mappings, you still need to be aware there are several inodes behind them and you need to pick the right one somehow... > All COW filesystems would benefit, as well as layered ones: lots of > fuse fs, and in some cases overlayfs too. > > Related: what can DAX do in the presence of cloned block? For DAX handling a block COW should be doable if that is what you are asking about. Handling of blocks that can be written to while they are shared will be rather difficult (you have problems with keeping dirty bits in the radix tree consistent if nothing else). Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>