Re: [PATCH 00/13] IO-less dirty throttling v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/18/2010 04:09 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
But mainly because we're taking the work accounting away from the user
who caused it and crediting it to the kernel thread instead, and that's
an actively *bad* thing to do.


That's happening more and more with workqueues and kernel threads.

We need the ability for a kernel thread (perhaps a workqueue thread) to say "I am doing this on behalf of thread X, please charge any costs I incur (faults, cpu time, whatever) to that thread".

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]