On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:43:10 +0000
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> > On Jan 3, 2017, at 13:22, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 4f52b6bb ("NFS: Don't call COMMIT in ->releasepage()"),
> > no tasks wait on PagePrivate, so the wake introduced in commit 95905446
> > ("NFS: avoid deadlocks with loop-back mounted NFS filesystems.") can
> > be removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/write.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> > index b00d53d13d47..006068526542 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> > @@ -728,8 +728,6 @@ static void nfs_inode_remove_request(struct nfs_page *req)
> > if (likely(head->wb_page && !PageSwapCache(head->wb_page))) {
> > set_page_private(head->wb_page, 0);
> > ClearPagePrivate(head->wb_page);
> > - smp_mb__after_atomic();
> > - wake_up_page(head->wb_page, PG_private);
> > clear_bit(PG_MAPPED, &head->wb_flags);
> > }
> > nfsi->nrequests--;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
> That looks fine to me. Do you want to push it through the linux-mm path or do you want me to take it?
Hi Trond,
Thanks. I don't see a problem with both patches going through your tree.
I think the patches to add this stuff went through your tree as well.
The removal of the export is really the only thing that makes patch 2
non-trivial, but considering it was added for NFS, I think it's safe to
remove.
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>