On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:48:44PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:10:49 +0000
> > The API is not guaranteed to return the requested number of pages and
> > may fail if the preferred allocation zone has limited free memory,
> > the cpuset changes during the allocation or page debugging decides
> > to fail an allocation. It's up to the caller to request more pages
> > in batch if necessary.
>
> I generally like it, thanks! :-)
>
No problem.
> > + /*
> > + * Only attempt a batch allocation if watermarks on the preferred zone
> > + * are safe.
> > + */
> > + zone = ac.preferred_zoneref->zone;
> > + if (!zone_watermark_fast(zone, order, zone->watermark[ALLOC_WMARK_HIGH] + nr_pages,
> > + zonelist_zone_idx(ac.preferred_zoneref), alloc_flags))
> > + goto failed;
> > +
> > + /* Attempt the batch allocation */
> > + migratetype = ac.migratetype;
> > +
> > + local_irq_save(flags);
>
> It would be a win if we could either use local_irq_{disable,enable} or
> preempt_{disable,enable} here, by dictating it can only be used from
> irq-safe context (like you did in patch 3).
>
This was a stupid mistake during a rebase. I should have removed all the
IRQ-disabling entirely and made it only usable from non-IRQ context to
keep the motivation of patch 3 in place. It was a botched rebase of the
patch on top of patch 3 that wasn't properly tested. It still illustrates
the general shape at least. For extra safety, I should force it to return
just a single page if called from interrupt context.
Is bulk allocation from IRQ context a requirement? If so, the motivation
for patch 3 disappears which is a pity but IRQ safety has a price. The
shape of V2 depends on the answer.
>
> > + pcp = &this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset)->pcp;
> > + pcp_list = &pcp->lists[migratetype];
> > +
> > + while (nr_pages) {
> > + page = __rmqueue_pcplist(zone, order, gfp_mask, migratetype,
> > + cold, pcp, pcp_list);
> > + if (!page)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + nr_pages--;
> > + alloced++;
> > + list_add(&page->lru, alloc_list);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!alloced) {
> > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > + preempt_enable();
>
> The preempt_enable here looks wrong.
>
It is because I screwed up the rebase.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>