Here are two patch of mm/memblock.c.
[1]. A trivial code refine in memblock_is_region_memory(), which removes an
unnecessary check on base address.
[2]. The original code forgets to check the return value of
memblock_reserve(), which may lead to potential problem. The patch fix this.
---
v3:
* remove the check for base instead of comment out
* Reform the changelog
v2:
* remove a trivial code refine, which is already fixed in upstream
Wei Yang (2):
mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in memblock_is_region_memory()
mm/memblock.c: check return value of memblock_reserve() in
memblock_virt_alloc_internal()
include/linux/memblock.h | 5 ++---
mm/memblock.c | 8 +++-----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>