Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dax: masking off __GFP_FS in fs DAX handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 20-12-16 11:13:52, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I am not fully familiar with the DAX changes which started this
> discussion but if there is a reclaim recursion problem from within the
> fault path then the scope api sounds like a good fit here.
> 
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx

Yes, once your scope API and associated ext4 changes are in, we can stop
playing tricks with gfp_mask in DAX code at least for ext4.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]